REC — ADRIAN, MI
Facebook →
PLATE
DEFLOCK ADRIAN — LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN

You and your car
are being tracked.
No warrant.
No crime. No vote.

Flock Safety automated license plate readers photograph every vehicle that passes — logging your plate, your car's "fingerprint," and a timestamped map of your movements into a nationwide searchable database. Not for people suspected of crimes. Everyone. We're documenting the problem and organizing to keep this dragnet out of Adrian.

1776 THE GREAT LAKES STATE DEFLOCK ADRIAN · MICHIGAN
01 /

The Fourth Amendment
is not optional

The Fourth Amendment guarantees "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." A network of AI cameras that photographs every car, reads every plate, and builds a time-stamped record of everywhere you drive — retained and searchable without a warrant, probable cause, or even suspicion — is exactly the kind of general, suspicionless dragnet the Fourth Amendment was written to prevent.

Police don't need to follow you for weeks anymore; Flock does it for them. Officers can query where your car has been — your church, your doctor, your union hall, a protest, a gun shop, an ex's street — with a few keystrokes and, in audited systems, often nothing more than the word "investigation" typed in a reason box. The Supreme Court warned in Carpenter v. United States that pervasive, retrospective location tracking crosses a constitutional line. Flock's business model lives on the wrong side of it.

This isn't a fringe theory. The Institute for Justice is suing Norfolk, VA over its Flock network on Fourth Amendment grounds, a court reviewing Flock-style "vehicle fingerprinting" found it likely violates the Fourth Amendment, and federal courts and Congress are now circling the company's warrantless nationwide search tools.

"Unconstitutional and a violation of Fourth Amendment protections." — How one Virginia engineer, now facing 13 felonies, described the cameras he tore down
0 WARRANTS
required to search where your car has been in most Flock deployments
83,000+
Flock cameras searched nationwide by a single Texas officer pursuing a woman over an abortion
5,000+
communities wired into Flock's shared national lookup network — including here in Michigan
30 DAYS
of your driving history retained by default — and searchable by agencies you've never heard of
02 /

Civil liberties die
in databases

A free country does not keep a permanent, searchable ledger of its citizens' movements. When every trip is logged, lawful behavior gets chilled: attending a protest, visiting a clinic, going to a mosque or an AA meeting, driving to a political meeting — all of it becomes a record someone else controls and someone else can weaponize.

This is not hypothetical. A Texas officer used Flock's national network to hunt for a woman who had a self-managed abortion — searching cameras in states where abortion is legal. Reporting by 404 Media exposed ICE-related and abortion-related lookups flowing through local police queries, forcing Flock to yank entire states out of its national search tool and triggering a Congressional investigation.

And when the machine is wrong, you pay for it. A journalist at The Drive was boxed in by four police cars — over a dealership typo 2,000 miles away that made Flock's AI flag his plate as stolen. Innocence is not a defense against bad data; the felony stop happens first and the correction comes later, if ever. Meanwhile 53 cities have cancelled contracts, and Michigan towns from Westland to Menominee are voting the cameras down.

Four police cars, guns at the ready — because a dealership typed "34 DTM" instead of "34 03 DTM." — The Drive, July 8, 2026
"Flock Safety credibility lost as it repeatedly lies to city councils, police departments, and the public." — ACLU headline, 2026
03 /

Your data: misused,
mishandled, unsecured

Every surveillance database eventually gets abused — by insiders, by outside agencies, and by whoever breaks in. Flock's is no different, except in scale: a nationwide map of everyone's movements, guarded by audit logs that nobody reads until a journalist does.

Police officers have been criminally charged for using Flock to stalk ex-partners and romantic interests — the Institute for Justice counts at least two dozen documented ALPR-stalking cases, and new ones keep surfacing. These are the abuses that got caught. The system's own design — instant nationwide search, vague "reason" fields, self-policed audits — guarantees the ones that didn't.

The sharing is just as bad as the stalking. The ACLU found Flock can pipe driver-surveillance data to other agencies even when a local police department opts out. Cities including Los Angeles have suspended or ended Flock programs over unauthorized federal data access and data-security concerns, and 53 cities have cancelled outright. Once your movements are collected, you have no control over where they go, how long they really live, or who's reading them. The only data that can't be abused, leaked, or subpoenaed is data that was never collected.

Follow the pipeline: Flock → federal fusion → Palantir. Flock's plate data doesn't stay with your local PD. Federal agencies have reached into Flock's network — CBP accessed it in violation of state law — and once your data enters the federal ecosystem, it flows through integration systems built by Palantir, the contractor that fuses government databases into ICE's surveillance backbone. Palantir's record on data handling speaks for itself: it was just caught holding Medicaid records ICE was never supposed to share. And the money is tangled too — Peter Thiel co-founded Palantir, and his Founders Fund bought into Flock's $275M round. Different logos. Same dragnet.

24+
documented cases of police using plate readers to stalk romantic interests
53
cities cancelled Flock contracts over unauthorized federal data access
OPT-OUT ≠ OUT
Flock can share your data even when your local police department says no
04 /

The record

CourtsIJ v. Norfolk: the federal case against a 172-camera Flock dragnetInstitute for Justice CourtsCourt finds pervasive "vehicle fingerprinting" likely violates the Fourth AmendmentEPIC CourtsThe Supreme Court just handed Flock's cameras a legal time bombThe Auto Wire · Jul 2026 CourtsFederal lawsuit argues Flock cameras violate the Fourth AmendmentWSPY News AbuseA Texas cop searched 83,000 cameras nationwide for a woman who got an abortion404 Media AbusePolice used plate readers to stalk romantic interests at least 24 timesInstitute for Justice AbuseAnother police officer criminally charged for abusing Flock surveillanceStraight Arrow News AbuseHow police cameras are open to officers' abuse — three states, same storyThe Marshall Project AbuseFlock wrongly tracked a journalist for days over a typo — then sent police after himThe Drive · Jul 2026 DataFlock removes states from national lookup after ICE & abortion searches revealed404 Media DataCongress launches investigation into Flock404 Media DataFlock can share driver-surveillance data even when police departments opt outACLU DataACLU: Flock repeatedly lied to city councils, police departments, and the publicACLU DataLAPD ends Flock camera program over data-security concernsLos Angeles Magazine DataFlock cameras track more than your license plate — and they're spreading fastEngadget MichiganWestland to remove Flock cameras after privacy concernsClickOnDetroit · Jul 2026 MichiganMenominee city council votes down Flock camerasTV6 · May 2026 DataFlock, Palantir, and the private companies quietly building a police stateCampaign Zero MichiganWarren narrowly renews Flock contract — the fight continuesDetroit News · Jul 2026
05 /

Recent news

Got a story we should add? Send it through the form ↓

06 /

Report a problem

See a camera? Log it. Wrongly stopped? Tell us. Worried about where your data went? Say so.

Every report builds the public record for Adrian and Lenawee County — where the cameras are, what they're doing, and who they're hurting. Camera sightings get verified and added to the national DeFlock map.

Reports are confidential. Name and email are optional unless you want a reply. Do not include anything you wouldn't want in a FOIA response.

Photos help. After submitting, you can send images via our Facebook page.

07 /

Do something